HOME

2008 Annual Meeting

INTERAREA SESSION 5

[ Interarea Sessions, Table of Contents | Panels by World Area Main Menu ]


Constructing Gender in Asian Performing Arts

Organizer and Chair: Ricardo D. Trimillos, University of Hawaii
Discussant: Tong Soon Lee, Emory University

Gender categories and behaviors in Asia form a counter discourse to globalized and Western notions of gender, which usually conflate it with sex and sexuality. Asian constructions of gender are often independent of the other two, as manifested in performing arts, which are often the primary indicator of a society’s cultural identity and sensibility. As a populist platform for cultural analysis and critique, they constitute a principal site for self- reflexivity. In addition, the arts represent one form of culturally "knowing." As commentator on and codifier of gender, the performing arts preserve established gender codes and at the same time promulgate change in its definitions and practices. The global circulation of gender models of the First World through mass media contest indigenous categories and behaviors. The arts comprise a means of resistance to such incursions. The panel examines diversity in gender construction through four case studies from China, Indonesia and the Philippines, followed by one discussant. Each of the four speakers explores a different aspect about gender: the enactment of masculinity by males or by females, and the enactment of femininity by males as entertainment or as religious act. The panel requests a “Crossing Borders” designation, because it includes two regions —East and Southeast Asia; three nations—Indonesia, the Philippines, and China; four cultures—Tagalog, Aklanon, East Javanese, and Cantonese; four disciplines—culture studies, ethnomusicology, anthropology and dance ethnography; and three nationalities among its speakers—U.S., Philippines, and China.

Performing Masculinity in Philippine Folk Forms: Ang Lalaking Pilipino
Ricardo D. Trimillos, University of Hawaii
Traditional masculinity in Filipino culture is more readily defined by behaviour than by physical appearance. Filipina social scientist Mary Racelis Hollnsteiner defines paglalake masculinity performatively, with siring children as one principal definer. Pervasive globalized notions of masculinity based upon physical appearance have origins in Western first-world societies, particularly the U.S. In the Philippines they are promulgated nationwide through the mass media, including film, television, and print advertising. As objects for domestication within Filipino consumer society, they pose a source of tension with “indigenous” paglalake as performance. The tension problematises Connell’s distinction between hegemonic and marginal masculinity. In the paper I argue that traditional religious and community events are sites for codifying and enacting Filipino qualities of paglalake masculinity. In the religious domain, Filipinos usually characterize women as being more religious and men less so. However, I claim there is a Filipino masculine religiosity. This religiosity is more frequently expressed in religious folk practices such as during Holy Week rather than in the established orthodox rituals of Roman Catholicism such as the mass or the Rosaries. Most dramatic is the practice of penitente flagellants during Holy Week in Central Luzon. The sarsuwela urban theatre, the komedya community theatre, and the balitaw song competitions comprise secular forms of public performance for paglalake masculinity. I also suggest causalities of change in Filipino gender constructions through contemporary globalization and the global circulation of Filipino labor.

“I am a Woman!”: Gendering Female while Performing Male in Cantonese Opera
Priscilla Tse, University of Illinois
Cross-dressing is a distinguishing performing practice of many operatic genres across China. Paralleling the well-known male dan (a female role-type performed by a male actor) of Beijing Opera, in Cantonese Opera in Hong Kong, cross-dressing is characterized by female performers enacting a male role-type, known as wenwu sheng. The practice of cross-dressed operatic performance, together with its gender ambiguity, dates back to the early twentieth century, and remains hugely popular among contemporary audiences. In this paper, I examine the change in gender identity presented by the iconic figure YAM Kim-fai (1912-1989) and her successors, through analyses of their stage performances, movies, websites, and reception by their audiences. I observe that, over the past two decades, there is an increased trend of feminizing the wenwu sheng role-type. Impersonation of males by actresses in performing arts, as frequently suggested, is closely related to female subordination in traditional Chinese society. I further argue that, along with the rising status of females in Hong Kong society, female wenwu sheng have attempted to negotiate power with males through their female bodies, rather than by both acting as a man on-stage and behaving like a man off-stage.

Gender, Symbolism and Power: Ludruk Folk Theatre in East Java, Indonesia
Carl J. Hefner, University of Hawaii
In the itinerant folk theatre of East Java, Indonesia the tandak ludruk cross-dressing male transvestites play all the female roles. Cross-dressed males are found elsewhere in Indonesia in a variety of venues, but it is within the context of the artistic and performative staging of ludruk that we can examine the unique symbolic role the transvestite plays in juxtaposition to notions of “maleness: The tandak ludruk occupies a gender liminal role (a betwixt and between) character and presents a unique figure of cognitive ambiguity. Today’s tandak ludruk, while acting in the persona of a female, challenge conceptualizations of male and female gender in East Javanese society and engage the audiences in their gender transforming symbolic dialogue, especially when the audience implicitly “accepts” their convincing female persona, yet at the same time possessing the knowledge that the person portraying the female is biologically male. I contend that the transvestite character implicitly tempts the audience to ponder definitions of gender and traditional social notions of sexual morality, accomplishing all this by creating a paradox in human reasoning. I argue that the role of the transvestite in ludruk does much to contest the established norms of gender domains and, in essence, creates a symbolic “figure of resistance” to notions of power, and dominant and submissive gender roles.

The Body Danced as Paradox in a Philippine Religious Festival
Patrick P. Alcedo, York University, Canada
Anyone who is familiar with Philippine festivals considers the internationally renowned Ati-atihan of Kalibo, Aklan to be one of the most carnivalesque and at the same time most religious events in the Philippines. Ati-atihan, which means to imitate the atis or the Negritos, is an annual street dancing festival that recalls the Philippines pre-colonial past; honors the Filipinos’ putative ancestors, the atis; and above all celebrates a community’s devotion to the Santo Niño or the Holy Child Jesus. Most Kalibonhons know the Santo Niño to be both a mischievous Boy and a King, who is endowed with power to grant devotees, tourists, and festival participants their wishes. Only in His pre-pubescence, the Santo Niño is also known to be gender ambiguous. This paper argues that the paradoxes between the carnivalesque and the religious and between the Santo Niño’s being a Boy and a King—coupled with His own gender ambiguity— make it possible for participants to perform gender in exploding ways. During Ati-atihan, for instance, half a dozen agi (roughly equivalent to gay men) transform themselves into Folies Bergère chorus girls. The paper focuses on this group of agi and describes the paradoxes in their street dancing at the Ati-atihan 2000. It maintains that their festival participation had established for them a much more intimate relationship with the Santo Niño that opened ways in coming to terms with their non-heteronormative behavior and in performing acts of resistance to the homogeneous heterosexuality the Roman Catholic Church has always imposed.